avevale_intelligencer: (Default)
[personal profile] avevale_intelligencer
I'm going to talk about Stepin Fetchit.

Lincoln Perry adopted the persona of Stepin Fetchit, which embodied many of the negative stereotypes surrounding the image of the black man in American culture, and ultimately became a millionaire as a result. He was just one of many actors, both black and white, who popularised this offensive image (Willie Best, who worked with Bob Hope among others, sometimes used the stage name of Sleep'n'Eat) and characterised black men in the public mind as lazy, illiterate, simple-minded, unreliable, or any or all of the above. Happily, that image has now been consigned to the dustbin of history.

The Black Panthers were an African-American revolutionary socialist organisation who attracted controversy for their militant posture. In the late sixties and early seventies a number of police officers and others were shot, killed or injured in confrontations involving members of the group. Over three hundred Panthers were arrested for these crimes, and dealt with by due process.

But nobody, as far as I know, had the unmitigated stupidity or the colossal gall to suggest that the Black Panthers were just ticked off because of the portrayal of black characters in films by such actors as Mr Perry and Mr Best. It was at least recognised, I believe, that this was just one of a huge raft of genuine and warrantable grievances.

So when you read someone on FB defending the makers of the offensive anti-Muslim propaganda film because the attacks on American embassies were horrific and unconscionable (which they were) and saying "being offended doesn't give you a licence to kill," stop and think for a moment about the possibility that maybe the extremists who fired the rockets might just have had more on their minds than a cheap, badly made, nasty little film...AND (and) that, even if that is not so, their monstrous overreaction does not render the original offence excusable. It does not.

It is not censorship to demand that people who have done no harm be treated with respect. It's not appeasement to shut someone up if they persist in yelling obscene accusations at innocent passers-by, even if someone reacts violently to them. It's basic human civility. It's a vital necessity if we are ever to live in peace with our neighbours. And if Mitt Romney gets in in November because too many people decide as a result of this incident that Obama is a secret Muslim and soft on terror, then it really won't matter if my apparently Limbaughesque conspiracy theory (in which I would like very much not to have to believe, please) was right or wrong.

That's it for the moment.
(deleted comment)

Re: Flouncing

Date: 2012-09-15 02:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eintx.livejournal.com
Facebook must be a very strange place if its members follow people they don't agree with home to their Livejournals and demand the right to be rude there!

Re: Flouncing

Date: 2012-09-15 02:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zanda-myrande.livejournal.com
The answer to the "lady'"s question is "just you watch me." Since from what I could gather "she" created the account purely to come here and abuse me, I don't think that's unfair.

As for Facebook, I think I'm finally cured.

Date: 2012-09-15 02:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pickledginger.livejournal.com
I think there's something to be said for pushing an existing stereotype so far it becomes satire, and the inherently toxic and nonsensical nature of the original is made plain. And something to be said, as well, for finding a way to make a living as an entertainer despite such stereotypes and limitations. I don't see that leaving mainstream entertainment all white would have been an improvement.

Date: 2012-09-15 07:54 pm (UTC)
howeird: (Colonel Sanders)
From: [personal profile] howeird
Very well put.

if Mitt Romney gets in in November because too many people decide as a result of this incident that Obama is a secret Muslim and soft on terror...
I don't think Romney has won any points on this. He has shown he is as ignorant of foreign affairs as Obama, and he doesn't have anyone as astute as the Clintons to draw from.

Date: 2012-09-15 11:57 pm (UTC)
ext_12246: (Glory Variation #1)
From: [identity profile] thnidu.livejournal.com
Much, much, MUCH more so. While some people label Obama "ignorant" on various points of foreign relations, Romney has a record of monumental ignorance.

Date: 2012-09-18 06:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] soren-nyrond.livejournal.com
But does this matter, strategically, so long as his election team are convinced that the electorate are more ignorant, and will therefore believe what they are told to ?

Date: 2012-09-16 10:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michael cule (from livejournal.com)
Obligatory geekish note: I always thought that Jar-Jar Ninks was Stepin Fetchit re-incarnated.

Date: 2012-09-16 06:44 pm (UTC)
batyatoon: (mightier than the sword)
From: [personal profile] batyatoon
I saw a review of Episode 1 that described Jar Jar Binks as talking like "the bastard lovechild of Roger Rabbit and Stepin Fetchit."

Spot-on, I thought.

Profile

avevale_intelligencer: (Default)
avevale_intelligencer

April 2019

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 19th, 2026 05:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios