avevale_intelligencer: (Default)
[personal profile] avevale_intelligencer
If, having read this post, you click on the link below and read the essay to which it links, I ask you as a courtesy not to comment there. I don't know this person and he doesn't know me, and I don't want him to get grief that I've earned. If you want to shout at someone, shout at me, all right?

The essay is a defence of the Catholic Church's position on homosexuality and marriage. It hasn't changed my mind on either of those issues, so there's no need to get on my case about that. I still think any two or more adult human beings who love each other should be able to express that love in whatever way they want, including marriage. I still think the Catholic Church is wrong.

What's given me pause--apart from the fact that this essay is incredibly well-written, closely-reasoned, and gives references--is that it makes it harder for me to believe that the Catholic Church's position is not supported by Christ's doctrine. The very first paragraph knocks the usual argument ("Jesus never condemned homosexuality") out of the court with a basic counter that even I should have been bright enough to see. It's only in the final paragraphs, where he suggests that liberals "deny that any difference exists at all" out of "disguised hate," that he goes completely off the beam. The rest of the article is uncomfortable reading for someone like me who, while not being a Christian, has always believed in a core of rightness under all the corruption and politicking. If this writer is correct, that belief is unfounded.

I don't know what to think now. I don't agree with the writer, obviously. I would very much like to know what my Christian friends think about this. (I think I can predict what my atheist friends will say, and I fancy the words "so," "you," "told," and "I" will feature strongly. I would like to take that as read, but I expect there's little chance of that.)

If you'd prefer not to get involved, that's fine.

http://fpb.livejournal.com/84324.html

EDIT: thank you very much to everyone who has commented so far. These comments have made the whole thing much clearer and put it into perspective for me. I'm glad I posted this, rather than just worrying about it on my own.

Date: 2011-10-20 12:45 am (UTC)
howeird: (Satan Claus)
From: [personal profile] howeird
Let me take a step to the side here for a moment. If we go by the theory that he advocated a return to the teachings of the Old Testament, homosexuality would have been so taboo to him he would not have talked about it, let alone advocated it.

Profile

avevale_intelligencer: (Default)
avevale_intelligencer

April 2019

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 10:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios