nuWho begins
Apr. 5th, 2008 08:06 pmAnd it would take a lot more than that to dent my bonhomie. However, herewith the obligatory grump:
Point one: he is not Spencer Tracy, and she is not Katherine Hepburn. Just thought I ought to clear that up, since there seems to be some confusion. He could be Jim Dale and she could be Joan Sims playing it common. If we stretch a point.
Aaaaaawwww, cute little fubsy creatures to distract us from the Plot That Makes Absolutely No Sense. They'll be going straight to plush toy then. I suppose it beats the plushy ebola virus. I remember when a show not unlike this was not entirely written for the benefit of the merchandising department.
Kudos, I suppose if I must, to RTD for including characters of divergent body shape, and for restraint in not (a) making them the villains, or (b) killing more than one on-screen. That's a change. About bloody time, one might say. Any deaths that do occur are, of course, either the Doctor's or Donna's fault. Gods forbid we should have a hero.
And once again he have the TARDIS making like a helicopter and flying through the air. If they showed an RAF Sea King burrowing into the earth, or an ocean liner being towed down the high street by four horses, there might be questions asked.
Ah well. At least this addiction isn't killing me.
Point one: he is not Spencer Tracy, and she is not Katherine Hepburn. Just thought I ought to clear that up, since there seems to be some confusion. He could be Jim Dale and she could be Joan Sims playing it common. If we stretch a point.
Aaaaaawwww, cute little fubsy creatures to distract us from the Plot That Makes Absolutely No Sense. They'll be going straight to plush toy then. I suppose it beats the plushy ebola virus. I remember when a show not unlike this was not entirely written for the benefit of the merchandising department.
Kudos, I suppose if I must, to RTD for including characters of divergent body shape, and for restraint in not (a) making them the villains, or (b) killing more than one on-screen. That's a change. About bloody time, one might say. Any deaths that do occur are, of course, either the Doctor's or Donna's fault. Gods forbid we should have a hero.
And once again he have the TARDIS making like a helicopter and flying through the air. If they showed an RAF Sea King burrowing into the earth, or an ocean liner being towed down the high street by four horses, there might be questions asked.
Ah well. At least this addiction isn't killing me.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-05 07:54 pm (UTC)Lil came in towards the end, took one look at the adipose, and remarked "Oh, bald Tribbles!"
Clearly we are never going to get a serious SF series from the BBC ever again. *sob*
no subject
Date: 2008-04-05 08:27 pm (UTC)However, everything else that you say is spot-on.
And that seemingly endless sequence of silent, overplayed (especially by Tate) gurning is one of the most cringeworthy scenes that nuWho has foisted on us yet. Right up there with, well, the Doc and Donna pootling along on Segways and laughing like idiots.
And - as I've said - apart from Bernard Cribbins, it was bloody awful. Ah well. At least Russ Boy is setting up his Big Plot early this year.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-05 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-06 08:06 am (UTC)In other news, Jared was heard to utter the words, "Hurrah! William Hartnell!!!" upon turning over to BBC4, and stayed entranced until I sent him off to bed at 9.20pm! Boy's got taste :-)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-06 09:56 am (UTC)Jared wins at Doctor Who appreciation. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-06 10:28 am (UTC)(I now have an image of RTD watching anime instead of doing his DW homework and getting told off by his teacher *g*.)
I was rather confused by the Hartnell series -- for some reason I remembered it as being in colour. Impossible, since not only was it made in B&W but we only had a B&W TV...
no subject
Date: 2008-04-06 05:49 pm (UTC)Given that the scheme was illegal enough for both Nanny and the parents to be prepared to kill to cover it up, there could have been unexplained dangers to the host population.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-06 09:08 pm (UTC)And if you doubt that this repeated pattern is deliberate on RTD's part, look at Clive's speech in "Rose." That's how RTD sees the hero of his series.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 11:13 am (UTC)Otherwise why not try the "no harm no foul" argument on the Doctor and Donna, instead of trying to kill them?
Of course a better writer might have hinted at such dangers if they were supposed to exist. But a better writer might have more credible aliens than the Adiposans - after all, if they can convert other tissue, why not have them convert fat into something that could actually walk, rather than rejects from a lard advert?
(But if Nanny would have been killed anyway had the plan worked, that's only one death, due to Donna before she met up with the Doctor, unless you want to blame her investigation on meeting the Doctor earlier (which is valid, but getting tenuous).)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-05 09:00 pm (UTC)However, I have taped the first three episodes of Dr. Who: The Daleks off BBC4. Ahhhhh... The tall blond Thals were just as handsome as I remembered. Much better.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-05 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-05 10:13 pm (UTC)We've only just finished watching Life on Mars.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-06 10:00 am (UTC)Oh, and there's a guy named Simon bar Jonas at the door wants a word about your icon... :)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-06 11:02 am (UTC)Amazing what you learn on the web, Petros, the name given by Jesus to Simon bar Jonas or Shimon Bar-Yonas, aka Peter the Rock, and a fisher of men. He's at the door? Please tell him I gave at the office.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 11:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 12:48 pm (UTC)Nu-Who has just lost these two members of its audience...
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 01:14 pm (UTC)Except for the unfortunate business with the Quarks, of course. Oh, and before them, the Mechanoids. =:o}
no subject
Date: 2008-04-07 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 06:12 pm (UTC)http://www.andrewrilstone.blogspot.com/
no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 01:28 am (UTC)Took him a while to notice, mind. I came to several of the conclusions he reaches quite early on in season one of nuWho. To me the entire three years so far have been a spirited attempt to squander forty years of emotional capital, and the only reason it isn't all gone is that there was so very much of it.
I realised something today. It was one of them piffany things.
Classic Who = Round The Horne (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Round_the_Horne).
nuWho = Stop Messing About (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Messing_About).
It works, I think. Our Doctor was Kenneth Horne, the central figure around whom everything happened, the raison d'etre of the show. He was never simply a straight man, but he had the gravitas to hold everything in balance. This one is Kenneth Williams, just another of the actors. He hasn't got the weight to sustain the central position, and since no-one has if he hasn't, there's nothing for events to revolve around. The only reason it keeps going at all is the sheer speed at which it runs; it doesn't dare stop, or it would fly apart completely.
So, going on relative running times and multiplying up, that would mean we might have as much as two more seasons of nuWho after the gap year. Personally, I doubt it'll last that long before flying to pieces, but you never know...