Here it comes...
Apr. 26th, 2005 02:28 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I see in the new TV listings thing that one of the actors in the next episode claims his character is going to make the Doctor "understandably jealous" by trying to put the moves on Rose.
This could be the deal-breaker. I have known the Doctor almost all my life and never known him to be prone to jealousy, certainly not of a companion. If he's jealous, as far as I'm concerned, he's not a Time Lord and certainly not the Doctor.
It may of course be that the guy is just making noises to fill column space. We shall see.
Edited to add: He was.
This could be the deal-breaker. I have known the Doctor almost all my life and never known him to be prone to jealousy, certainly not of a companion. If he's jealous, as far as I'm concerned, he's not a Time Lord and certainly not the Doctor.
It may of course be that the guy is just making noises to fill column space. We shall see.
Edited to add: He was.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-26 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-26 02:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-26 02:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-26 02:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-26 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-26 05:11 pm (UTC)(Uncle Sir Pterry writing a Doctor Who / Discworld crossover script would be interesting...)
no subject
Date: 2005-04-26 05:59 pm (UTC)"Oook?" *
* So what? Ever heard of L-Space?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 09:05 am (UTC)Good God NO!
But a Robert Rankin Who/Brentford crossover, now that would rock...
no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 01:01 pm (UTC)If the actor you're talking about is the one who plays Micky (or should that be Ricky?) then I suspect the Doctor won't notice a thing. Personally I think Micky needs to grow up a little before he's a good match for Rose. Although having her missing for a year might have started that process.
So I need to figure something out. we just saw Episode 4. (I double checked that part) here in Canada. You guys saw Episode 5? On Saturday? So we are 10 days behind?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-27 01:43 pm (UTC)