His "permission" was received by lying and manufacturing evidence. Therefore, any permission granted base on it was, by his own actions, immediately rescinded. The jury cannot be blamed when the evidence presented is faulty. The fault remains with the presenter of the evidence.
You're making a strictly logical assertion based on a preferred interpretation of the facts. It is also immediately invalidated for the same reason.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2011-04-25 04:30 pm (UTC)You're making a strictly logical assertion based on a preferred interpretation of the facts. It is also immediately invalidated for the same reason.