Some ideas to ponder
May. 13th, 2009 08:16 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
avevale_intelligencerAccusation equals conviction.
The opinion of the witness is admissible as evidence.
The defendant is guilty till proven guilty.
Appearing for the defence is proof of complicity.
Evidence for the defence is inadmissible.
Disagreeing with the prosecution is contempt of court.
And finally
This issue is so important that it supersedes every other consideration.
Or in other words
The end justifies the means.
How successful, do you think, would one be at establishing truth, working on the above principles?
The opinion of the witness is admissible as evidence.
The defendant is guilty till proven guilty.
Appearing for the defence is proof of complicity.
Evidence for the defence is inadmissible.
Disagreeing with the prosecution is contempt of court.
And finally
This issue is so important that it supersedes every other consideration.
Or in other words
The end justifies the means.
How successful, do you think, would one be at establishing truth, working on the above principles?