Date: 2008-11-06 02:08 pm (UTC)
because like many other aspects of the electoral system it's out dated. That's how it's always been done. In the 1700 - 1800's is made some sense, travel being more difficult, counting ballots and tabulating the results and them getting them to the capital (new york in those days I think) Perhaps I'm being eleitist, rude and snooty here, but I think it would be a fine thing if their system would come in to say the 20th century? And I don't count those stupid voting machines. Think of the money they could save if they were restricted to say 6 weeks for each stage, that would still give them plenty of time to get all over the country. We aren't in the 1800'd anymore.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

avevale_intelligencer: (Default)
avevale_intelligencer

April 2019

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 22nd, 2025 12:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios