![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
"...the detection of the qubit in the future must be symmetric in time with its creation in the past. "If the past detector was active at a quarter to 12:00, then the future detector must wait to become active at precisely a quarter past 12:00 in order to achieve entanglement."
I'm as interested in time travel as the next fan, but I can't help wondering (unlike any of the commenters, at least at the time of writing) what an arbitrary division of time based on the rotation of our particular planet and a more or less random point on its surface has to do with anything. But then, since I don't know what a "qubit" is, maybe that's a silly question. Maybe you have to know if a particular particle is running on GMT before you use it. Or maybe this whole thing is a little scientific joke. I don't know.
In another collection of links,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I don't need to tell anyone here that I disagree utterly with this. I've been supported and helped too many times when I was in trouble as a result of my own mistakes to have any claim on that particular patch of moral high ground, and the people who helped me seem to have thought it was a good idea at the time. I certainly did, and do. We are here to help each other, not to judge each other; that's my feeling, and it's a fairly strong one. (Which is not to say that I approve of Bush's bailout of the banks, but that likewise should be clear from previous posts.)
But quite apart from that, while there may be some in the Tea Party who feel that way, I find it hard to believe that everyone in that camp is acting from such--noble?--motives. I could be wrong, though. Frequently am.
There's a lot more, but I have work to do. I hope everyone's having a good Friday (not a Good Friday, though, that's not for a while yet).