avevale_intelligencer: (self-evident)
avevale_intelligencer ([personal profile] avevale_intelligencer) wrote2016-03-20 01:27 am

H2Gt2G

I've been listening to Douglas Adams read the Hitch-Hiker books in sequence. This involved, of necessity if I was going to do it properly, listening to Mostly Harmless.

I find Mostly Harmless a bad book. Not that it's not well written; of course it is. Not even that it's not funny; again, that practically goes without saying. It is, however, the book you write when you have been writing about the same characters for years, or even decades, and are thoroughly miserable and pissed off with the characters, the publisher, and the idiotic readers who won't let you do anything else. It is a "do not ask me again" book, a book tainted with ill-feeling. As such, well, not to get spoilery, but if you are a Hitch-Hiker's fan who is (a) prone to depression, (b) not in tune with the current of thought that really and incomprehensibly gets off on bleak, black, hopeless downbeat stories in which the bad guys finally and irrevocably win and everyone you love dies (and if you are in tune with it, then the previous four books, and the fourth one especially, will probably seem intolerably saccharine and unrealistic to you), then this book, well-written and funny though it be, is probably not for you.

Thank gods for the BBC and Dirk Maggs, who adapted the last three books for radio and had the good sense to change the ending. I am now working backwards through the radio series, though I'll probably stop at number three.

I feel sure I've either read,or listened to, Eoin Colfer's And Another Thing, which was I think a continuation of the story, but it has completely slipped my memory, which the original author's stuff never does.

Anyway, I just wanted to mention it.

EDIT: in the scripts book, Dirk Maggs pours scorn on the idea that the fifth book was tainted by "a strange sort of authorial spite," but also reveals that Douglas later regretted the abrupt ending to the series and might have done more had he lived. One pays one's money and one takes one's choice. I only know how it made me feel.

[identity profile] clothsprogs.livejournal.com 2016-03-20 08:44 am (UTC)(link)
I rather like the Colfer continuation, it felt like Adams.

Teddy

[identity profile] pbristow.livejournal.com 2016-03-20 09:58 am (UTC)(link)
Have you tried the recent adaptations of his Doctor Who stories? I've got Shada: Good book; clearly Adams; yet also clearly a "collaboration". With enough space given to it to expanding the original so that, even if you've watched/heard the reconstructed original or read the script a zillion times, you get something new for your time/effort/money. =:o}

Edited 2016-03-20 09:58 (UTC)

[identity profile] pbristow.livejournal.com 2016-03-24 07:16 pm (UTC)(link)
...And prompted by this conversation, I have just this afternoon/evening bought "City of Death", on my way back from the council offices. Different "Noveliser" this time, James Goss, so I've no idea how it will compare. (The "Shada" one was by Gareth Roberts, who has *always* done a fine evocation of the (Adams & Williams-driven) Season 17 style.)

Edited 2016-03-24 19:16 (UTC)

[identity profile] dickgloucester.livejournal.com 2016-03-20 03:26 pm (UTC)(link)
It's so long since I've read them that I can't even remember Mostly Harmless. I'm currently skimming Eddings (again) as my going-to-sleep fare - the Elenium. When I get to the Tamuli, I'll see the Troll-gods again - and I love the Troll-gods.

[identity profile] pbristow.livejournal.com 2016-04-10 09:05 am (UTC)(link)
And on a tangentially related note, I recently stumbled across the following that I thought might interest you... The new home of some old friends... =:o}

http://www.dailymotion.com/DavidAgnew