I saw your statements about it being a crime perpetrated by murderers and how it shouldn't have happened. All of which I agree with.

I just dipped my oar in to point out that your analogy had a hole in it, because the Charlie Hebdo people were equal-opportunity offenders. I'm quite of the opinion that you aren't required to condone the cartoons, but I'm always in favor of people making the strongest arguments that they can (in a logical sense, not in the sense of being strident).