avevale_intelligencer (
avevale_intelligencer) wrote2011-06-29 09:40 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I really need to be doing things...
...but I can't let this go. Someone (whom I won't name because I don't know if they want their LJ and FB identities linked) just quoted on Facebook:
"Morality is doing what is right no matter what you are told. Religon is doing whatever you are told no matter what is right."
As an example of the statement that sounds good without at any point touching on truth, I don't think that can be bettered, and it shows up how insidiously persuasive a nice jingly Wildean paradox can be--I almost found myself nodding sagely at it for a second. But good grief, morality is *all about* what we're told--morality is tribal. And as for the stupid, facile old canard about religion being mindless obedience, I don't even need to bother refuting that, do I? I'm sure I've done it before, anyway, and I haven't got the spare computer time right now.
So, let's compose some nice jingly Wildean paradoxes.
"Bacon and eggs are tasty without being healthy. Muesli is healthy without being tasty."
See how it works? You have a try. See how convincing you can make any old rubbish just by balancing two phrases one against the other.
I'll check back tonight. I may award points.
"Morality is doing what is right no matter what you are told. Religon is doing whatever you are told no matter what is right."
As an example of the statement that sounds good without at any point touching on truth, I don't think that can be bettered, and it shows up how insidiously persuasive a nice jingly Wildean paradox can be--I almost found myself nodding sagely at it for a second. But good grief, morality is *all about* what we're told--morality is tribal. And as for the stupid, facile old canard about religion being mindless obedience, I don't even need to bother refuting that, do I? I'm sure I've done it before, anyway, and I haven't got the spare computer time right now.
So, let's compose some nice jingly Wildean paradoxes.
"Bacon and eggs are tasty without being healthy. Muesli is healthy without being tasty."
See how it works? You have a try. See how convincing you can make any old rubbish just by balancing two phrases one against the other.
I'll check back tonight. I may award points.
no subject
(I'm just making up an example here, honest.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Um. So you think that "grab all you can and devil take the hindmost" is moral if that's what you're told? Seriously?
If you do, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree about morality being what you are told.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Morality V Religion
It was fine for keeping the surfs in order but has long since outlived it's usefulness.
If we must have fantasy I go for the Easter Bunny.
Re: Morality V Religion
Re: Morality V Religion
Re: Morality V Religion
no subject
But debating someone who will never change his mind is ignoring your own wisdom.