avevale_intelligencer (
avevale_intelligencer) wrote2008-10-29 07:04 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Yawn
So, for anyone who hasn't already found out, David Tennant has confirmed what we've all known for ages, that he is leaving nuWho after the specials. Speculation is rife all over LJ about who will/should replace him: I've commented here and there that someone who is capable of playing the Doctor would be nice. As in older, not a sexpot, damn well upper class British thank you so very much, not prone to sexual entanglements with other species, and able to convey that s/he is not a doormat or a scapegoat. I have had the hangdog look up to here.
We'll see what happens.
We'll see what happens.
no subject
See the pics for The Next Doctor. His outfit looks awesome, if it is indeed him.
no subject
no subject
And he's still too young for my taste. If it were my decision, I wouldn't be looking at anyone much younger than me (fifty-four next birthday).
no subject
William Hartnell was 54
Jon Pertwee was 51
Patrick Troughton was 46
Sylvester McCoy was 44
Christopher Eccleston was 41
Tom Baker was 40
Colin Baker was 40
Paul McGann was 37
David Tennant was 34
Peter Davison was 30
(information from IMDB; ages may be off by a year because I only looked at the year of birth and season start, I didn't go down to actual birth and season start dates). Going by those it seems that William Hartnell is the only one of whose age you approve...
David Morrisey was born in 1964, which makes him 44 now, above the median age of 40.5 (also above the mean which is 41.7).
no subject
Hang on, how old is the lad who'd playing Merlin? Given that Gaius looks very like Hartnell (in that wig...), there's a
crossover (including T.H. White's Merlin!)handover looming there...no subject
no subject
no subject
And individuals age at different rates. Troughton looked older than his years at the time; Davison looked younger than his.
Anyway, we can go round and round indefinitely on this. I think older actors are generally better for that part, for reasons I've already stated. If you don't, that's fine: I don't necessarily expect anyone to agree.
no subject
Seriously, I thought at the time that Davison, Tennant and McGann were all too young for the role. Eccleston had so many other problems for me that his age was entirely overshadowed. The others, apart from Hartnell, mostly managed by sheer presence to make age irrelevant to their portrayal, which is the ideal...but in general, you can only be ageless if you've aged a bit. Otherwise you're just young. Tennant is still young. It doesn't matter how many times his Doctor says "I'm so old now" and such like, he is callow and unfinished and easily cowed and just not right.
The pictures I've seen so far of David Morrissey look young in the same way, though that may just be the character he's playing, and it's unfair to judge a performer on a still picture. But I believe there was a conscious decision to make the Doctor more accessible to yoof, and I think it was a wrong decision, and casting someone--okay, not necessarily someone in his or her fifties, but someone capable of playing him as the timeless alien that he is, would go some way to redress that mistake.
They won't, though.
no subject
no subject
no subject