For entertainment only
I've been reading Asimov again...
THE WISE OLD PHYSICIST: We can best understand the Einsteinian interpretation of gravity if we picture the universe as a flat, thin, superflexible sheet of untearable rubber. If we picture mass as being associated with weight, as it is on the surface of the earth, then we would expect a mass, resting on the rubber sheet, to make an indentation. The greater the mass, the deeper the indentation. In the--
ME: Excuse me. Why?
THE W.O.P.: Why what?
ME: Why would it make an indentation?
THE W.O.P.: Well, because the weight would pull the mass--
ME: Why would it pull the mass?
THE W.O.P.: Because we're picturing mass as being associated with weight. Do try to listen.
ME: Aha. So somewhere under this rubber sheet there is a large mass to which these other masses are attracted.
THE W.O.P.: Yes.
ME: By gravity.
THE W.O.P.: Yes.
ME: Which is what this analogy is supposed to be explaining.
THE W.O.P.: Yes. Um--
ME: We're going to need another rubber sheet.
THE W.O.P.: Look, it's just an analogy.
ME: Not a very good one, is it? Gravity exists because masses in the universe exert a force upon it, which is gravity. A bit circular, don't you think?
THE W.O.P.: We don't know why gravity exists--
ME: A-ha!!!
THE W.O.P.: But this image accounts for the way gravity operates better than the old model of a force operating between masses.
ME: That's because it's got the old model of a force operating between masses built into it. It's turtles all the way down. If you take out the little man pedalling the car won't run. If you take the force of gravity out of your analogy the masses just sit on the rubber sheet and it stays flat.
THE W.O.P.: Look, just shut up, will you.
ME: Thank you, Professor, I understand so much better now.
THE WISE OLD PHYSICIST: We can best understand the Einsteinian interpretation of gravity if we picture the universe as a flat, thin, superflexible sheet of untearable rubber. If we picture mass as being associated with weight, as it is on the surface of the earth, then we would expect a mass, resting on the rubber sheet, to make an indentation. The greater the mass, the deeper the indentation. In the--
ME: Excuse me. Why?
THE W.O.P.: Why what?
ME: Why would it make an indentation?
THE W.O.P.: Well, because the weight would pull the mass--
ME: Why would it pull the mass?
THE W.O.P.: Because we're picturing mass as being associated with weight. Do try to listen.
ME: Aha. So somewhere under this rubber sheet there is a large mass to which these other masses are attracted.
THE W.O.P.: Yes.
ME: By gravity.
THE W.O.P.: Yes.
ME: Which is what this analogy is supposed to be explaining.
THE W.O.P.: Yes. Um--
ME: We're going to need another rubber sheet.
THE W.O.P.: Look, it's just an analogy.
ME: Not a very good one, is it? Gravity exists because masses in the universe exert a force upon it, which is gravity. A bit circular, don't you think?
THE W.O.P.: We don't know why gravity exists--
ME: A-ha!!!
THE W.O.P.: But this image accounts for the way gravity operates better than the old model of a force operating between masses.
ME: That's because it's got the old model of a force operating between masses built into it. It's turtles all the way down. If you take out the little man pedalling the car won't run. If you take the force of gravity out of your analogy the masses just sit on the rubber sheet and it stays flat.
THE W.O.P.: Look, just shut up, will you.
ME: Thank you, Professor, I understand so much better now.